Fuel Usage in Poultry Brooding: A Study of Ahiazu Mbaise Local Government Council of Imo State, Nigeria

Authors

  • E. O. Ahaotu 1Department of Animal Science, University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Umuagwo, Imo State, Nigeria. 2Department of Animal Production and Health Technology, Imo State Polytechnic Omuma, Imo State, Nigeria. Author
  • P.C. Okeke Department of Animal Science, University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Umuagwo, Imo State, Nigeria. Author
  • V.T. Nwakamma Department of Animal Science, University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Umuagwo, Imo State, Nigeria. Author
  • J.A. Onwukwe Department of Animal Production and Health Technology, Imo State Polytechnic Omuma, Imo State, Nigeria. Author
  • V. C. Simeon-Ahaotu Department of Microbiology, Gregory University, Uturu, Abia State, Nigeria. Author
  • De los Ríos Patricio Universidad Católica de Temuco, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas y Químicas, Temuco, Chile. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26765/DRJVMAS33061687812

Keywords:

Brooding, Poultry farming, Fuel usage, Temperature management, Small-scale farmers, Nigeria

Abstract

Brooding plays a vital role in chick survival and growth, requiring precise temperature regulation. However, increasing fuel costs and inefficiencies in conventional brooding systems pose serious challenges to poultry farmers, particularly in developing regions. This study examines fuel usage patterns, farmer characteristics, and key constraints affecting poultry brooding in Ahiazu Mbaise Local Government Area, Imo State, Nigeria. A purposive and multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 60 poultry farmers from 10 communities. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and interviews, and analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages. The majority of farms (94%) operated 3–5 units, while 66.7% of farmers maintained stocking rates between 1 and 500 birds. Kerosene brooders were the predominant energy source (66.7%), followed by charcoal (25.0%) and gas brooders (8.3%), with no adoption of radiant tube heaters. Most respondents were male (62%) and aged between 20 and 40 years (72%). Key constraints identified included poor marketing infrastructure (40%), limited access to credit (32%), and low awareness of improved brooding technologies (18%). Poultry farmers largely depend on inefficient and costly fuel sources, underscoring the need for affordable, energy-efficient brooding alternatives to enhance productivity and sustainability.

Fuel Usage in Poultry Brooding: A Study of Ahiazu Mbaise Local Government Council of Imo State, Nigeria

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

Ahaotu, E. O., Okeke, P., Nwakamma, V., Onwukwe, J., Simeon-Ahaotu, V. C., & Patricio , D. los R. (2026). Fuel Usage in Poultry Brooding: A Study of Ahiazu Mbaise Local Government Council of Imo State, Nigeria. Direct Research Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, 11(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.26765/DRJVMAS33061687812

Most read articles by the same author(s)